23rd February 2011

LV= announces rise in critical illness and income protection payouts in 2010

LV

  • 93.5% of critical illness claims paid, up from 90% in 2009
  • 92% of income protection claims paid, up from 90% in 2009
  • Publication of statistics encourages greater trust
  • Call for more providers to publish income protection claims stats 

Protection specialist LV= has today published its 2010 protection claims record, which shows an increase in claims paid on both critical illness and income protection policies. 93.5% of all critical illness claims, and 92% of income protection claims were paid in 2010, both up from 90% of claims paid in 2009.

The amount LV= paid in claims also increased in 2010, paying over £9m in critical illness claims (£7.9m in 2009), and more than £12m in income protection claims (£11.9m in 2009). Over the years, LV= has maintained a consistent track record of paying protection claims with a steady upward trend in the number of claims accepted. LV= is one of only a few providers to publish its income protection claims data.

2010 protection claims data from LV= also reveals:

  • The most common reasons for critical illness claims were cancer (63%) followed by heart attacks (12%)
  • The average payout on a critical illness policy was £74,511
  • The top causes of income protection claims were mental disorders (30%), and musculo-skeletal disorders (20%)
  • The average annual benefit for income protection claims was £15,596, with an average seven year payout. 

Mark Jones, LV= head of protection, said: “Our consistently high and improving claims payment illustrates our firm commitment to support people in their time of need, and to limit the risk of any concern at the point of applying for a policy. This success is in part down to the investment in our tele-interviewing service, intelligent underwriting, and exploring the reasons for non-disclosure rejections in past years and putting measures in place to reduce them.

“When people make a claim on a protection policy, it is often at an extremely difficult time in their life. As such it is absolutely vital that we are a provider that can be trusted, not just to pay claims, but also to treat claimants in a caring and professional manner.

“Our transparency in publishing protection claims statistics reflects our policy of openness. We want to make sure that advisers and consumers alike are fully aware of why claims can be rejected, so that we can all play a part in keeping rejections to a minimum.” 

Matt Morris, senior policy adviser at protection intermediary LifeSearch, comments: “These are excellent paid claims figures from LV=. It is particularly pleasing to see the income protection stats included as not every insurer publishes these figures, although they should do for the sake of transparency in the eyes of the consumer.” 

LV= has produced separate guides detailing its income protection and critical illness claims performance for 2010.These guides are designed for financial advisers to use with their clients to help them understand why it is important to disclose full information when they apply for a policy. The guides also demonstrate the ‘more than just a cheque’ benefits from LV=, which include the Extra Care claim support service. 

Also detailed in the guides are examples of claims LV= has paid out during 2010, bringing to life actual customer scenarios and showing the benefits they are now receiving from their LV= protection policies.

LV= critical illness and income protection claims data in detail:

 

 

Critical illness

2010

Critical illness

2009

Income protection 2010

Income protection

2009

Total amount of claims paid out£9,015,813£7,902,487£12,000,607£11,909,585
Average benefit£74,511£72,500£15,596 annually

£11,740

annually

Average length of claim per policynana7 years8 years
Average age of female claimant at claim46464444
Average age of male claimant at claim49494746
Total claims paid93.5%90%91.6%90%
Declined claims - non-disclosure2.9%3%2.7%3%

Declined claims –

not meeting claim

definition

3.6%7%5.7%7%
Total declined claims6.5%10%8.4%10%

 

Examples of critical illness claims paid by LV= in 2010

 

Critical illness diagnosis

GenderTotal benefit paidAge
Multiple sclerosisF£500,00033
Brain tumourM£140,00035
Kidney failureM£100,00038
Triple coronary artery bypass graftM£111,66543
Amputation of right legM£50,00045
Ovarian cancerF£51,83848
Stomach cancerM£70,52153
Heart attackF£35,99854
StrokeM£365,39459
Bowel cancerF£86,14461

 


Examples of income protection claims LV= paid in 2010:

Age at claimGenderOccupationCause of claimWhen we started paying the claimTotal amount paid so far
34MCo DirectorMultiple sclerosisJan 1986£1,446,562
39FBank clerkMEMar 1991£476,133
41FSolicitorDepressionJun 1990£471,582
42FSupermarket managerBack painFeb 2009£13,508
47MChiropractorTendonitis both wristsDec 2000£191,280
48MEstate agentHeart attackAug 1997£754,560
52MFarmerLower back painDec 1998£375,264
52FHealth visitorAlzheimer'sFeb 2005£67,270
56MProject supervisorStrokeOct 2006£81,800
58MVeterinary surgeonBroken fibula / tibiaMay 2008£13,423

 

 

For further information about LV= please go to www.LV.com/adviser

 

 

Protection

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

Cirencester: Talking Protection - Think Marathon Not Sprint


In the latest AMI Protection Viewpoint report, only 39% of respondents recalled their broker asking about protection insurance, but 99% of brokers said they asked their clients about it

Read More

Cirencester: How Protection Builds Life Resilience


Life is a lottery. One minute everything could be going your way, the next something crops up that blocks your path. The problem may be small, simple to solve and something you can easily overcome to get back on track.

Read More

Cirencester: The Rise of the Multi Job Worker


Over the recent weeks and months, I’ve had several conversations with Advisers where they are struggling to explain how providers approach workers with more than one job. This is not a new issue but one that’s more prevalent today.

Read More

You need to be logged in to comment on this article