1st September 2010

"The FSA speak with forked tongue"?

SIFA letter of the week

In CP09/18 - The Retail Distribution Review (RDR) paper the FSA encouraged advisers to make better use of structured products in their advice to consumers!

Now with the benefit of hindsight they changed their mind. Having failed to regulate structured products and their providers, in the FSA's recent (October 2009) paper on the collapse of Lehman's, they blame advisers for the promotion of the very products they advocated in CP09/18.

Much worse they now point consumer redress at the IFA's pocket in full knowledge that the IFA is set up as a regulatory compensation "patsy", the subject of the FOS (the S stands for Stasi) and its lack of an Appeal process which is thought to offend the "fair trial" provisions of Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights ECHR incorporated into law by the Human Rights Act 1998.

Are we to take these regulatory standards as an example of Treating Customers Fairly?

Thank God we live in a free and fair country governed by the rule of law rather than by an unelected, unrepresentative quasi judicial quango?

Yours sincerely
Simon Mansell
Temple Bar IFA Ltd

Panacea Comment

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

When vulnerability policies go wrong


I have never considered myself to fit such definition but since passing 75 I am beginning to wonder if lip service is being paid by regulated firms or they have just made it more difficult for their customers?

Read More

The Golden Rule of AI for Financial Advisers: Protect Your Client Data


Artificial intelligence has the potential to transform the way advice firms work, helping to reduce administration, improve efficiency and free up more time for clients. But before embracing AI, there is one principle that should never be overlooked

Read More

Getting Better Results from AI: The RTCC Framework


Artificial intelligence is only as good as the instructions you give it. If you’ve ever asked AI a question and received an answer that felt generic, vague or simply not quite right, don’t be too quick to blame the technology.

Read More

You need to be logged in to comment on this article