23rd April 2009

FSA, openness and the Freedom of Information Act

padlockA number of our IFA members are becoming more and more concerned that requests for information, explanation or clarity under the FOI Act are being rejected. Why is this?

I think that many IFA’s are amazed that a regulator who focuses so much on TCF, Principles, being open, honest, fair and reasonable does not apply those standards when the request for information comes to them rather than from them.

For an FSA “Information Protection Officer” (where did that job title come from) to suggest that sight of GCD advice to the FSA for example may prejudice the FOS in any judicial review of an Ombudsman’s decision is very worrying, what does the FOI documentation request show; it clearly must be contentious if the release is being denied.

I think that the time has come for the FSA to be as open and honest in its dealings, after all this is what it expects from those that it regulates. Regulation with dual standards is not appropriate.

Click here to read a reply given to a Panacea member this week, I think you will see what we mean. Have you any examples of similar rejections, if so please e mail them to help@panaceaadviser.com

Panacea Comment

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

The Golden Rule of AI for Financial Advisers: Protect Your Client Data


Artificial intelligence has the potential to transform the way advice firms work, helping to reduce administration, improve efficiency and free up more time for clients. But before embracing AI, there is one principle that should never be overlooked

Read More

Getting Better Results from AI: The RTCC Framework


Artificial intelligence is only as good as the instructions you give it. If you’ve ever asked AI a question and received an answer that felt generic, vague or simply not quite right, don’t be too quick to blame the technology.

Read More

Beyond the Hype: The Four Pillars of AI Assistance for Financial Advisers


Artificial intelligence has quickly become one of the biggest talking points in financial services. But once you look beyond the headlines, many advisers are left asking the same question: “What would I actually use it for?” If your only experience of AI has been asking it to write the occasional email, you’re only scratching the surface.

Read More

You need to be logged in to comment on this article