4th December 2025

Financial Ombudsman Service needs significant overhaul in 2026

An article in FT Adviser on 2nd December highlights growing concern over how the Financial Ombudsman Service exercises its discretionary powers, especially around time-barred cases and inconsistent decision making. The article includes views from Panacea’s CEO, Derek Bradley who argues that firms need clearer processes, stronger independent oversight and, critically, a realistic right of appeal that doesn’t require a costly judicial review.
 
With cases such as mortgage prisoners and historic Tenet advice claims raising serious questions about fairness and consistency, the debate over long-stop rules and FOS accountability is gaining momentum.
 

Panacea Comment

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

When vulnerability policies go wrong


I have never considered myself to fit such definition but since passing 75 I am beginning to wonder if lip service is being paid by regulated firms or they have just made it more difficult for their customers?

Read More

The Golden Rule of AI for Financial Advisers: Protect Your Client Data


Artificial intelligence has the potential to transform the way advice firms work, helping to reduce administration, improve efficiency and free up more time for clients. But before embracing AI, there is one principle that should never be overlooked

Read More

Getting Better Results from AI: The RTCC Framework


Artificial intelligence is only as good as the instructions you give it. If you’ve ever asked AI a question and received an answer that felt generic, vague or simply not quite right, don’t be too quick to blame the technology.

Read More

You need to be logged in to comment on this article