7th April 2022

FCA at it again

The FCA has proposed to hike, as usual each year, its annual funding requirement for advisers from £82.3mn to £86.5mn, a mere £4.2mn!

The regulator said in its fee proposal document of the 7th April that its overall additional call for cash is estimated to go up by £26.4mn in 2022/23, an increase of 4.3 per cent from £613.7mn in 2021/22 figure to £640.1mn.

This is becoming the industry eaten by a regulatory type of tapeworm.  As we know tapeworms can live up to 20 years metamorphosing, in this case, over each regulatory incarnation of Nasdim, PIA, FIMBRA, FSA and FCA. 

Advisers become hosts to this regulatory infection simply as a result of being involved in a regulated financial services business. Host symptoms can include:

  • Nausea.
  • Weakness.
  • Diarrhoea.
  • Abdominal pain.
  • Hunger or loss of appetite.
  • Fatigue.
  • Weight loss.
  • Vitamin and mineral deficiencies.

For many advisers hearing this news some or all these symptoms will no doubt be ‘presenting’ today. 

Add to that the ongoing impact of increasing PI premiums, FOS costs, ever increasing FSCS calls having to be paid by fewer firms all means that the worm continues to grow. 

The FCA have downsized their Olympic Park office space, there should be some cost savings there surely?

But I guess that the cost of compulsory unconscious bias training, replacing 323 lost laptops and November 2021’s confirmation that £5m (very close to that £4.2mn increase) was being spent on more laptops for employees WFH will need to see this being paid for.

Added to that the Unite union which represents FCA staff. It said members voted by 87 per cent in favour of strike action in its non-binding ballot, which closed on January 31 this year. 

The FCA is currently ‘consulting’ on changes to its employment package. 

Extraordinarily, at a time when the government is seeking civil service pay restraint, most staff could expect to see a 5% increase at least and many getting quite a lot more.

The FCA is trying to justify the fee hike by noting the number of advice firms under its watch will decrease from 12,301 to 11,901 in 2022/3.

These may be reasons why an increase is due, but not a justification. 

Just a thought, do e-mail me yours.

Panacea Comment, Regulation

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

When vulnerability policies go wrong


I have never considered myself to fit such definition but since passing 75 I am beginning to wonder if lip service is being paid by regulated firms or they have just made it more difficult for their customers?

Read More

The Golden Rule of AI for Financial Advisers: Protect Your Client Data


Artificial intelligence has the potential to transform the way advice firms work, helping to reduce administration, improve efficiency and free up more time for clients. But before embracing AI, there is one principle that should never be overlooked

Read More

Getting Better Results from AI: The RTCC Framework


Artificial intelligence is only as good as the instructions you give it. If you’ve ever asked AI a question and received an answer that felt generic, vague or simply not quite right, don’t be too quick to blame the technology.

Read More

Comments (4)

Strictly economically speaking Advisers do not 'pay' these trading taxes. They are 'incident', largely, on our clients with a much smaller part of the financial pain landing on employees and owners. This is true of all companies and all notionally corporate taxation. Businesses do not and never will 'pay' any tax. We will all collect taxes and pass them on to racket outfits like the Financial Catastrophe Authority or HMRC.

Steven Farrall   08/04/2022   11:50
It is amazing how these Bodies can manifestly fail at everything they do, but continually levee such an admin and Financial Burden on the diminishing pool of Advisers.

At the current rate of Adviser attrition and FCA/FOS growth in numbers, there will soon be more of them than us.

They will all be working from home on New Laptops, part time, filling in their expenses sheets, between 9 and 5 we hope, until there are no Financial Advisers left!

I feel physically sick, and stressed every time something from The Regulator arrives.

I have had enough, and cannot go on, despite running a Great Chartered IFA, SUCCESSFULLY FOR OVER 20 YEARS WITH OVER 350 MILLION FUM, AND GREAT PROFITABILITY!

They are Utterly Unaccountable, and now seem to be inciting complaints on the Witch Hunt of Final Salary Transfers! Despite The Treasury Commitment to Pension Freedoms.

Firm name withheld as requested



Withheld   08/04/2022   12:06
At the point where the numbing effect of years of the same insanity from something I have NO control over, other than to pay or not to trade, I really am waiting for the second coming when someone will turn up tip the pigs out of the trough and scream what madness for sane people to work in......sent from a laptop off the back of a wagon!

Firm name withheld


Withheld   08/04/2022   16:36
I am one of the IFAs exiting the business and closing my firm.

Your list of symptoms are all accurate and I cannot wait to wake up in the morning in my converted American School bus and not have to think about the regulator ever again.

Having been in the industry since 1984 I have lived, through the nightmares of ever increasing and irrelevant regulatory impositions on an industry which by and large has worked well. I have seen the effect of endless stifling rules and have come to literally hate the regulator (my mother told me never to say I hate something or someone as it means you want to kill it/them); I hate the FCA.

I could go on, but I would rather write a book and earn some money selling it.

Name and firm withheld was requested

Withheld   11/04/2022   16:34

You need to be logged in to comment on this article